SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 624

1996(2) Supreme 768
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh and Faizan Uddin, JJ.
R.D. Upadhyay - Petitioner
versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 559 of 1994 1
Decided on 19-3-1996

IMPORTANT POINT
Right to Speedy Trial Is guaranteed as "fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. To give meaning to the right remedial measures such as: nominating special judges to exclusively try and decide within six months long pending cases of murder; Immediate bail by the Court for accused charged with attempt to murder if case pending for more than two years and for accused charged with minor offences if in detention for more than one year may be ordered.

Headnote:(i) Public Interest Litigation - Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 21-lndian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302 - Under trials in Tihar Jail Delhi for periods ranging from one to eleven years-Persons charged with murder-Delay in commencement of trial whether infringement of right to speedy trial? (Yes)

       Order: Delhi High Court asked to nominate 10 additional district judges to exclusively take up trial of these cases-Dispose of within six Public Interest Litigation-Constitution of Indian Articles 32 and 21 -Persons charged under-Indian penal Code, 1860-Sections 304, U6, 390 and 391-Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Official Secrets Act, 1924; Extradition Act; Terrorist and Disruptive S. No. Name of Offence Activities Act - Dowry Prohibition, let-Appropriate decision to be taken by Delhi Administration.

       (ii) Public Interest Litigation - Constitution of India, Articles 32 and 21-lndian Penal Code, 186.0Section 307-Undertrials in Tihar Jail-Charged with attempt to Murder-Cases pending for more than two years-Release or bail forthwith to satisfaction of trial Courts-Application for bail not required-Court to consider suo moto.

       Public Interest Litigation - Constitution of India-Articles 32 and 21- Persons charged under - Indian 376, 390 and 391 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Offical Secrets Act, 1924; Extradition Act; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act - Dowry Prohibition - Act - Approriate decision to be taken by Delhi Administration.

       

ORDER

This public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, an advocate of this Court. It has been highlighted in the petition that a large number of under-trial prisoners have been languishing in Tihar Jail without trail for a very long period. This Court by the order dated November 7, 1994 directed the Superintendent Tihar Jail to file an affidavit giving list of under-trial inmates of Jail who are confined for over a period of one year. sh. Tarsem Kumar, Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar has filed an affidavit dated February 9, 1996 and has annexed a list giving jail wise break-up of under-trials who have spent more than one year at Central Jail, Tihar, Delhi as on January 25, 1996. The list indicates that there are under-trial prisoners who are in jail for a period ranging from one year to 11 years. Mr. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the NCT, Delhi has categorised the list of under-trials offence-wise. The total cases café go rised by Mr. Srivastava come to 1930. The list is as under:

S. No. Name of Offence Total Cases

1. Murder 880

2. Attempt to Murder 89

3. N.D.P.S. 264

4. Rape 137

5. Kidnapping 68

6. Dacoity & Robbery 1881

7. TADA 122

8. Dowry & 302 IPC 74

9. Theft 55

10. Cheating 10

11. Arms Act 18

12. Counterfeiting 6

13. Official Secret Act 8

14. Custom 1

15. Escape 1

16. U/s. 326 IPC 2

17. U/s.324 IPC 1

18. Riots 3

19. Extradition Act 1

20. U/s. 354 IPC 1

Total Cases 1930

We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel agree that a speedy trial is guaranteed as a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. So far as 880 murder cases are concerned, we request the Delhi High Court to nominate/designate Ten Additional District Judges to take up exclusively the trial of these cases. The High Court may consider directing the Additional District Judges, so nominated, to dispose of these cases within a period of six months or so.

So far as the cases regarding attempt to murder are concerned, we direct that the cases which are pending for more than 2 years, the under-trials shall be released on bail forthwith to the satisfaction of the respective trial courts. Persons facing trial for Kidnapping, Theft, Cheating, Arms Act, Counterfeiting, Custom, Under Section 326 IPC, Under Section 324 IPC, Riots and Under Section 354 IPC who are in jail for a period of more than one year, shall, be released on bail forthwith to the satisfaction of the trial courts concerned. There may be cases where the under-trial persons may not be in a position to furnish sureties etc. In those cases, the trial courts may consider - keeping in view the facts of each case especially the period spent in jail- releasing them on bail by furnishing personal bonds.

We make it clear that it shall not be necessary for any of the under-trials to move application for bail. The court shall, suo moto, on the authority of this Court s order, consider the bail cases. This shall be done by all the courts concerned within two weeks of the receipt of this order. We give liberty to all concerned to approach this Court for further directions, if necessary.

A copy of this order be sent to the District & Sessions Judge, Delhi by tomorrow. He shall issue the necessary directions in this respect to all the Courts functioning under his jurisdiction. A copy of this order be also sent to the Superintendent, Tihar Jail with a direction that he shall bring this order to the notice of all the concerned under trials.

So far as the under-trial accused of the offences under NDPS, Rape, Dacoity & Robbery, TADA, Dowry and Under Section 304 IPC, Official Secret Act, Escape, and Extradition Act are - concerned, the NCT Delhi Administration


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top