SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 668

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUHAS C.SEN
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Paliwal Electricals Private LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.-The Allahabad High Court has struck down Para-7 of the Exemption Notification No. 175 of 1986 dated March 1, 1986 (which para was inserted by the Notification No. 223 of 1987) on the ground of violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The decision under appeal is largely influenced by and follows the decision of a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court in Banner and Company v. Union of India1.

2. Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules empowers the Central Government to exempt, subject to such conditions as it may specify, any excisable goods from the whole or any part of duty leviable on such goods.

3. By means of Notification No. 175 of 1986 issued under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, exemption from excise duty was granted in favour of certain small scale industries manufacturing the goods specified in the schedule to the Notification provided their annual turnover did not exceed the limit prescribed. The relevant portions of the Notification read :

"3. Nothing contained in this notification shall apply if the aggregate value of clearances of all excisable goods for home consumptions :-

(a) by a manufacturer, from on


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top