SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 665

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, SUHAS C.SEN, G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
United Copiex India Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Sales Tax – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sen, J-Special leave granted.

2. In this case we have to decide whether rubber flaps manufactured by the appellant can be classified under sub-entry (2) of Entry 43 in the Schedule to the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948. The relevant Entry in the Schedule has been set out in the judgment of the High Court as under :

"(I) Motor vehicles including motor cars, motor taxi cabs, motor cycles, motor cycle combinations, motor scooters, mopeds, moterettes, motor omnibuses, motor vans, motor lorries, motor trucks, jeeps, station wagons and chassis of motor vehicles and bodies or tankers or motor caravans built or meant for mounting on chassis of motor vehicles, but excluding tractors whether on wheels or on tracts.

(2) Components, parts and accessories of vehicles specified in sub-entry (1) above, including tyres and tubes, batteries and trailers adapted for use along with the said vehicles, other than such trailers as are predominantly used along with any other vehicles."

3. The appellants are manufacturers of rubber flaps which are used for giving support to the rubber tubes used in the tyres of motor vehicles. The contention of the appellant is that-such rubber flaps do not fal
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top