SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 783

S.P.BHARUCHA, K.RAMASWAMY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Abhjram Singh – Appellant
Versus
C. D. Commachen – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Ramaswamy, J.-After spending considerable time on diverse questions canvassed across the bar, we are of the opinion that this appeal requires to be posted before a Constitution Bench for deciding the questions that arise in the appeal. We would, however, indicate in brief the facts,the findings recorded and the questions raised which impress us to refer the matter for decision by the Constitution Bench. This appeal under Section 116B of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 [for short, the Act ] arises from the judgment dated December 24, 1991 of the Bombay High Court passed in Election Petition No. 11 of 1991.

2. The respondent, since deceased, his legal representatives have been brought on record and a notice, as required under the Act, was also duly published. He contested as a Congress Party candidate in the election to No. 40, Santacruz Legislative Assembly Constituency in 1990 for the Maharashtra State Assembly. The appellant is the returned candidate who filed his nomination on January 31, 1990 which was accepted on February 8, 1990. The poll was held on February 27, 1990. The result of the election was declared on March 1, 1990 declaring that t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top