SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 778

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Surbhan – Respondent


ORDER

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of acquittal passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 53 of 1987 on June 28, 1990. The case of the prosecution is that on July 11, 1986, at about 6.30 p.m. while the deceased was returning after taking water from the tank, the respondent-accused came from behind and gave a blow with falia and went away. P.W.2, Ratan Singh, son of the deceased who is an eye-witness to the occurrence raised an alarm upon which P.W. 3, Vesta, P.W.4, Nawal Singh, P.W. 5, Amar Singh and others came to the scene of occurrence whereat Ratan Singh, P.W.2 narrated that the accused came from behind and attached the deceased. The deceased was taken to the hospital and was declared dead. The FIR was lodged at 9.30 p.m. on the same day. After investigation, the accused was apprehended and after all the witnesses were examined, the trial Court convicted the respondent-accused for offence of murder under Section 302, IPC and sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court acquitted the respondent. Hence this app








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top