SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 647

1996(4) Supreme 247
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Bashir Ahmad & Ors. -Appellants
versus
State of Punjab & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6909 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 5437 of 1994)
Decided on 22-3-1996

Headnote:Service Law-Appellants working as driver in department of State retrenched as surplus-Vacancies notified for direct recruitment in another department-Rules prescribed two qualifications, namely, light vehicle driving licence and knowledge of Punjabi language upto middle standard-Question of reading down the rule did not arise as appellants was not a case of promotion from the cadre of cleaners to the post of Driver within the quota of 10% -Appellants since did not possess qualifications, dismissal of their writ cannot be said illegal. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana made on February 22, 1994 in CWP No.12838/93. Admittedly, the appellants had worked initially as cleaners and thereafter they were promoted as Drivers in Poultry Department of the State of Punjab. Since they were found to be surplus, they were retrenched. When the Government had notified for direct recruitment in the Department of Animal Husbandry, the appellants also had applied for direct recruitment. They were not selected on the ground that they did not possess the required educational qualifications. Consequently, they filed the writ petition which came to be dismissed. Thus, this appeal by special leave.

3. The learned counsel for the appellants has strenuously contended that this Court in B.N. Saxena v. N.D.M.C.1 read down the rule holding that after the initial appointments experience gained for a considerable length of time is itself a qualification for promotion and, therefore, requirement of further qualification was bad in law. He also relied upon another judgment in State of U.P. & Ors. v. J.P. Chaurasia & Ors.2 Relying thereon, it is contended that the rule prescribing educational qualifications as one of the qualifications for direct recruitment must be read down. So read down, since the appellants have the necessary experience, it must be construed to be a qualification for recruitment. The view taken by the High Court and recruitment authority is bad in law. We find no force in that contention. It is seen that for the direct recruitment as a driver, the rules prescribe two qualifications, namely, light vehicle driving licence and knowledge of Punjabi language upto middle standard. The Rules also prescribe promotion of 10% drivers from the lower rank of cleaner. Therein, it is provided that apart from the qualifications prescribed for direct recruitment, the cleaner also must have an experience of a minimum period of 4 years. We are not concerned with regard to the promotion from the cadre of cleaners to the post of Driver within the quota of 10%. Therefore, the question of reading down the rule does not arise. We are concerned with the direct recruitment only. The Government in the rule have prescribed driving licence and also knowledge of Punjabi language upto middle standard to be the qualifications. Therefore, anyone who possesses those qualifications has to be considered for recruitment. Since, admittedly, the appellants are not fulfilling the said criteria, the dismissal of the writ petition cannot be said to be illegal.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Appeal dismissed.

 

********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top