SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 762

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
U. P. Elect. Board Through Its Chairman – Appellant
Versus
Triveni Engineering Works – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated May 4, 1995 made in W.P. No. 23865/90 by the High Court of Allahabad. The admitted facts are that the respondents had entered into an agreement for the supply of electrical energy,initially of 104 KW. The load was mixed type load for industrial purpose as well as for light and fans of the factory under clause [8] of the agreement. Section 48 of the Electrical Supply Act, 1948 empowers the Board to revise the tariffs from time to time. One of the conditions under clause [8] read as under :

" 8 (a) The Consumer shall pay for the supply of electric energy at the rates enforced by the Supplier from time to time as may be applicable to the Consumer.

Provided that in the event of alternative rates being available for that category of load, the consumer shall have the option to choose the tariff that suits him best.

(b) The rate Schedule applicable to the consumer at the time of execution of this agreement is annexed hereto as Annexure.

(c) The rate schedule abovementioned met at the discretion of the Supplier, be revised by the Supplier from time to ti





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top