SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 906

M.M.PUNCHHI, K.T.THOMAS
Santosh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The High Court dismissed the writ petition of the appellant in limine.

3. The appellant had put to challenge order dated 27.3.1990 (Annexure-H) whereby she was conveyed by the School authorities under whom she was working as a Hindi Teachress, that since she had secured her Teacher s Training from the Secondary Education Board, U.P., Bareilly, which was not recognized by the Haryana Government, she had to be relieved from her duties thenceforth with immediate effect. By one stroke of pen, her long durated service spanning from 21.10.1980 onwards, which began on six monthly basis, (ignoring small gaps here and there ) till the year 1990 was wiped out; whereas undeniably other Teachers similarly situated on six months basis, had been able to mature as permanent teachers entitled to continue in service. The lone disquieting factor was that the appellant had a diploma which did not have the approval of the Haryana Government and yet in laxity teachers had been appointed, in order to draw work out of them, to meet the State s educational needs.

4. It was for the first time on 7.7.1981 (copy of instruction placed on file) that the Directorate of Education, Haryana wo





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top