SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 842

S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Bhogendrajha – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Jha – Respondent


ORDER

The appellant is a returned candidate to the 10th Lok Sabha from 13, Madhubani Parliamentary Constituency in Bihar. The last date for filing nominations for the Lok Sabha Elections was April 26, 1991. The date of scrutiny was April 27, 1991. Out of 61 candidates who filed nominations, three nomination papers of Pawan Kumar Pathak, PW-4, Lal Bahadur Singh, PW-6 and another came to be rejected by the Returning Officer during scrutiny. Poll was held on May 23, 1991. Out of 49 candidates who remained in the contest, the appellant had secured 3,30,111 votes, i.e., 51.91 per cent as against the nearest candidate Dr. Jagannath Mishra who secured 2,50,020, i.e., 39.31%. Rest of the candidates could not even protect their deposits. The respondent Manoj Kumar Jha, an elector filed the election petition impugning rejection of the nominations of PW4 and PW6 as bad in law. The High Court in the impugned judgment has upheld his contention and declared the election of the appellant as void in E.P.A. No. 7/1991 dated August 25, 1995 by Patna High Court.

2. In this appeal, the only question is: whether the view of the High Court that the Returning Officer had not conducted summary enquiry under















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top