SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 108

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Ramesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

Notification under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894) (for short, the Act ) was published on August 2, 1973 acquiring the lands situated in Etmadpur Village for public purpose. The Collector awarded compensation under Section 11 by his award dated February 19, 1974. Dissatisfied therewith, Ramesh Singh and Hari Singh filed application under Section 18 which was duly referred by the Collector to the Civil Court. The Additional District Judge, Gurgaon dismissed the reference petition on May 3, 1978. Rumal Singh, one of the claimants equally sought a separate reference in respect of his claim. Thereon, the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon enhanced the compensation. The Legal Representatives of Ramesh Singh, the petitioners and Hari Singh filed an application to implead themselves in the reference of Rumal Singh which was also dismissed by the District Judge on May 1, 1986. The petitioners allege that they challenged the order in a revision said to have been filed on November 3, 1986 and is stated to be pending decision in the High Court. However, we are not concerned with the same.

2. When Rumal Singh filed execution application to enforce his award made under






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top