G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Mangilal Pindwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.C. Agrawal, J.-The question that falls for consideration in this appeal relates to the validity of the amendment introduced in Rule 244(2) of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ) by notification dated March 11, 1976. Rule 244(2) makes provision for compulsory retirement of a Government servant.
2. The respondent was employed as an Upper Division Clerk with the Government of Rajasthan. After he had completed 25 years of qualifying service he was compulsorily retired by order of the Collector, Ajmer dated March 31, 1973 on payment of three months pay and allowances in lieu of notice. The said order was passed under sub-rule (2) of Rule 244 of the Rules. Along with the order of compulsory retirement a bank draft for a sum of Rs. 1,494/- representing three months pay and allowances was sent to the respondent. The respondent filed a writ petition in the Rajasthan High Court challenging the said order of compulsory retirement. The said writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court by order dated January 17, 1978 on the ground that there was non-compliance with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 244 of the R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.