1996(5) Supreme 292
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy, Faizan Uddin and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Natwarbhai Magainbhai Patel -Petitioner
versus
Collector & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. ...... of 1996
(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 13088 of 1996)
CC No. 2297 of 1996
Decided on 10-5-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : J. Trivedi and S.C. Patel.
ORDER
Delay condoned.
2. Counsel for the petitioner admits that a notification under Section 10(5) of the Urban Ceiling Act was published pursuant to which the excess vacant land was surrendered and taken possession of by the Government. Consequently, the land stands vested in the State free from all the encumbrances. In what manner the lands require to be utilised has been regulated under the provisions of the Act. It is not a condition, under the Act, that payment of compensation be made before utilisation of the land of which the petitioner was erstwhile owner. Under these circumstances, we do not find any illegality in the order passed by the High Court in Special Civil Appeal No. 4093/93 on May 15,1995.
3. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.
SLP dismissed.
******
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.