SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 821

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Jairamsharma – Appellant
Versus
Jammu Development Authority – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order dated February 10, 1995 of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir in LPA No.77 of 1990. The admitted position is that while the respondent No.5, P.N. Jalla, was on deputation as Senior Steno, the appellant was appointed on regular basis as Office Superintendent. For the post of Public Relations Officer, he is required to be considered for promotion on regular basis. Instead of promoting him on regular basis, the deputationist was considered and promoted. The appellant challenged the said action by way of writ petition which was not properly considered by the Division Bench. When the matter had come up for admission, this Court on August 21, 1995 had passed the following order :

"Counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner does not require payment of back-wages but his due seniority is to be considered according to rules. The 3rd respondent was only a senior stenographer from Govt. service and was on deputation. While the petitioner is a regular employee and is entitled to be considered, when the vacancy of Public Relations Officer had arisen, he was




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top