SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 952

B.L.HANSARIA, G.N.RAY
Vayallakath Muhammedkutty – Appellant
Versus
Illikkal Moosakutty – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The defendant in two suits being O.S. No. 633 of 1984 and O.S. No. 47 of 1985 filed in the court of learned Munsif, Kozhikode, is the appellant in this appeal. The respondent instituted suit No. O.S. 47 of 1985 against the defendant appellant for a mandatory injunction restraining him from entering the suit premises by contending that the said defendant was given licence to run a hotel business in the suit premises for a prescribed period and such leave and licence having expired, defendant had been illegally carrying on the business of hotel in the suit premises belonging to the plaintiff. The other suit being O.S.No.47 of 1985 was instituted against the defendant appellant for recovery of an amount of Rs.4082/- being the balance licence fee and interest. The defendant appellant contested both the suits by contending that the defendant was not a licencee for running the plaintiff s hotel business but he was inducted as a tenant on payment of daily rent as stipulated. The defendant appellant also contended that he had regularly paid the rent which was revised from time to time and after adjusting the arrea











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top