SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 577

K.RAMASWAMY, K.S.PARIPOORNAN, S.P.BHARUCHA
Hookiyar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Special Land Acquisition Officer, Moradabad – Respondent


ORDER

Substitution allowed.

Leave granted. We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [for short, the Act ] acquiring an extent of 171.46 acres of land situated in village Tigarea Bhoor, Tehsil Hasanpur, District Mordabad for public purpose, viz., UPSIDC, was published on September 28, 1981. The Land Acquisition Officer [LAO] classified the lands into several categories and accepting the sale deed, item 51, determined compensation at the highest rate of Rs.15,500/- and gradually reduced the market value basing upon the classification. On reference under Section 18, the District Judge by his award and decree dated may 22, 1989 increased the compensation to Rs.40,000/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the determination of the compensation, the claimants as well as the State filed appeals in the High Court.

3. As seen, the High Court proceeded on the premise that the classification of the lands was not warranted, the entire land commands same value and that, therefore, uniform rate of market value is required to be adopted in determining the compensation. The High Court had accepted the sale deed relied on by the LAO and







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top