SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1173

1996(6) Supreme 131
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.P. Bharucha and S.C. Sen, JJ.
State of Gujarat -Appellant
versus
Rajesh Kumar Chimanlal Barot & Anr. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 10191 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12085 of 1996)
Decided on 5-8-1996
Cournsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Yashank Adhyaru & Ms. H. Wahi, Advocates.
For the Respondents : M. Barot. Sr. Advocate and Ms. H. Khatun, Advocate.                             

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act-Question of pricing not falling within the purview of adjudication by Consumers Disputes Redressal Forum-If Court did not have jurisdiction, it could not ignore it regardless of fact that one of parties involved was Gram Panchayat or period involved was very short. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. The order under appeal is passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in first appeal against an order of the State Commission.

The order under appeal opens with these words :

"Although there is substantial force in the contention advanced by the learned Advocate General, Mr. Thakore, appearing on behalf of the appellant, that the question of pricing does not legitimately fall within the purview of adjudication by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums, regard being had to the Peculiar facts and circumstances of the case where only a very small period of about 10 months is involved and the party concerned is a Gram Panchayat, which is claiming benefit of subsidised rate of 25 paise per unit in respect of electricity consumed by it for the supply of drinking water to its residents from a bore-well, we are not inclined to interefere with the order passed by the State Commission upholding the right of the panchayat to the benefit of the said subsidy."

3. We find this very difficult to appreciate. If a court does not have jurisdiction, it does not have jurisdiction, regardless of the fact that one of the parties involved is a Gram Panchayat or the period involved is very short or the amount involved is very small. If a court does not have jurisdiction, it is the obligation of the appellate court so to hold and to set aside the order under appeal.

4. Having regard to the fact that the dispute did not "legitimately fall within the purview of adjudication by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Formus", the appeal is allowed, the order under appeal is set aside and the claim made by the respondents before the State Commission is dismissed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Appeal allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top