SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1063

1996(6) Supreme 293
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Vasant Gangaramsa Chandan -Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 9860 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 21843/94)
Decided on 15-7-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : S.K.C. Pasi, Advocate.
For the Respondents : A.M. Khanwilkar, Advocate.

IMPORTANT POINT
Pension is a right attached to the office and cannot be denied arbitrarily.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Pension-It is earned by employee for service rendered to fall back, after retirement-It is right attached to office and can not be denied arbitrarily-Rule proving for qualifying service either from that date employee took charge to the post to which he was first appointed or from date employer started deducting provident fund, whichever was later -Word later must be read down to whichever is "earlier" otherwise it would be arbitrary offending Article 14 of the Constitution. (Para 4)

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Heard both sides.

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench made on November 11, 1993 in Writ Petition No. 3505/93. The appellant was working as on April 1, 1957 as Peon-cum-Watchman in the Hyderabad Agricultural Committee. Consequent upon the State s reorganisation, the appellant had gone to and joined the service of the Krishi Utpadan Bazar Samiti at Jalna district. He retired from service on April 1, 1991 after completing about 35 years of service. His qualifying service was computed w.e.f. October 1, 1969. He claimed the service from the date of his appointment. It was denied on the ground that he started contributing towards Provident Fund w.e.f. the aforesaid date and, therefore, his pensionary benefit required to be computed from that date.

3. Clause 23 of Chapter VI in the scheme reads as under :

"Qualifying service of a Market Committee employee shall commence from the date he takes charge of the post to which he is first appointed or from the date of employer started deducting the P.F. contribution for the employee which ever later."

4. A reading clearly indicates that the qualifying service is from the date he takes charge of the post to which the was first appointed or from the date the employer started deduction of provident fund from the employee, whichever is later. Pension is not a bounty of the State. It is earned by the employee for service rendered to fall back, after retirement. It is a right attached to the office and cannot be arbitrarily denied. Therefore, we read down the rule. We hold that reading the rule which is "later" must be read down to whichever is "earlier". If so read, the rule is valid. Otherwise, it would be arbitrary offending Article 14 of the Constitution. Mr. Khanwilkar, learned counsel for the respondent contending that the appellant is not entitled to the D.A.; on the other hand, learned counsel for the appellant contended that pursuant to the order passed by the High Court to pay D.A. resolution had already been passed by the Committee and the D.A. has already been paid to him.

5. The pensionary benefit will be computed from April 1, 1957 within two months from the date of receipt of this order and payment of arrears be paid accordingly.

6. The appeal is allowed accordingly. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top