SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1151

1996(6) Supreme 318
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh & S. Saghir Ahmad, JJ.
Sri Jagathigowda, C.N. & Ors. -Appellants
versus
Chairman, Cauvery Gramina Bank & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 9891 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 10088 of 1992)
Decided on 31-7-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Ashish Dholakia, Tripurari Ray, Advocates for Vineet Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent : M.L. Verma, Sr. Advocate, S.N. Bhat, (S.K. Kulkarni) Advocate for M.T . George, and M.M. Kashyap, Advocates.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976-Gramina Bank-Promotions to cadre of Senior Managers-Guidelines issued to Bank by National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development dated April 7, 1986-Promotions were to be made on basis of comparative assessment of performance appraisal of officers concerned-Procedure adopted by Director s Committee was just and fair-Instructions of NABARD being in nature of guidelines- Promotions made by Bank cannot be set aside unless same are arbitrary and unfair.

       Held that the cumulative reading of the two guidelines issued by the NABARD (quoted above) clearly shows that the promotions were to be made on the basis of the comparative assessment of the performance appraisal of the officers concerned. This has precisely been done by the Director s Committee of the Bank. Even otherwise the procedure adopted by the Director s Committee was just and fair. The instructions of the NABARD being in the nature of guidelines the promotions made by the Bank cannot be set aside unless the same are arbitrary and unfair. It is settled proposition of law that even while making promotions on the basis of seniority-cum-merit the totality of the service record of the officer concerned has to be taken into consideration. The performance appraisal forms are maintained primarily for the purpose that the same are taken into consideration when the person concerned is considered for promotion to the higher rank. The High Court, with respect, was not justified in holding that the performance appraisal could not be taken into consideration by the Director s Committee while considering the officers for promotion to the higher rank. (Para 7)

       

JUDGMENT

Kuldip Singh, J.-Special leave granted.

2. A learned single Judge of the Karnataka High Court allowed the bunch - petitions filed by the respondents and quashed the promotions made by the Cauvery Gramina Bank, Mysore (the Bank) to the cadre of Senior Managers on the short ground that the guidelines issued to the Bank by the National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (the NABARD) were not followed while making the promotions. A Division Bench of the High Court upheld the judgment of the learned single Judge. The appellants- affected officers - have challenged by way of this appeal the correctness of the judgment of the learned single Judge and that of the Division Bench of the High Court.

3. The Bank was sponsored by the State Bank of Mysore and established in October 1976 under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. The NABARD was established in the year 1982 with a view to look after the agricultural and rural development in the country. The NABARD has been issuing guidelines from time to time regarding the conditions of service of the employees of the rural banks in the country. The NABARD issued a circular dated December 31,1984 providing guidelines for appointments /promotions in the rural banks to the posts of Senior Managers/Area Managers and General Managers. The relevant part of the circular is as under :

"Area Managers/Senior Managers:

(a) Source of Recruitment : 100% by promotion from amongst officers working in bank. Promotions will be on the basis of seniority-cum-merit. If suitable officers are not available internally, these posts could be filled by taking temporarily officers of the sponsor Banks and other banks/organisations on deputation."

NABARD issued another circular dated April 7, 1986 which clarified the procedure and provided for the standard to be adopted for promotions in the rural banks in India. The relevant part of the circular is as under:

"For effecting promotions, the Board may constitute one or more staff selection committees depending on the scale of the posts for which the candidates are to be interviewed, for the purpose of selecting the employees of the bank for promotion to higher posts. The Committee should have at least three official directors of the Board excluding Chairman, of which one should be form the National Bank or the Reserve Bank and one each from sponsor Bank and State Govt. respectively. Also one member from SC/ST community should be represented in such committees as indicated in our circular letter dated 9.12.1985. The selection of the eligible candidates should be based on performance of respective candidates in the bank. The recommendation of the committees should thereafter have the approval of the Board before effecting promotions."

The Bank issued its own guidelines by the circular dated July 17,1986 for appointment to the posts of Area Managers? Senior Managers and invited applications from eligible officers to be considered for promotion. The relevant part of the circular is reproduced hereunder:

"The question of strengthening the supervisory support at the field as well as at the Head Office level consequent on growth in the volume of business and geographical coverage has been examined by the Government of India in consultation with the NABARD. They have approved, in principle, creation of the posts of Area Managers/Senior Managers as and when required and justified by the volume and nature of business. In the light of the guidelines issued by the NABARD in this regard, the Board of Directors have approved creation of a few posts of Area Managers and upgradation of a few Managers posts at Head Office to Senior Managers posts.

The following guidelines have been laid down for appointment to the posts of Area Managers/Senior Managers.

SOURCE OF RECRUITMENT

(a) 100% by promotion from amongst the eligible officers;

(b) Seniority-cum-merit;

(c) If suitable officers are not











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top