SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1190

K.T.THOMAS, S.P.BHARUCHA
Collector Of Customs, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Shibani Engineering Systems, Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bharucha, J.-The respondents imported two consignments of cups which are parts of taper roller bearings. They filed bills of entry for clearance classifying the goods under entry 8482.99 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and claimed the benefit of the concessional rate of duty provided by an Exemption Notification (No. 70/89).

2. The relevant part of the Exemption Notification reads thus :

"6. Parts of goods covered by S1.No. 5 above namely :

(a) Cups and Cones of roller bearings covered by items (a) and (b) of Sl. No. 5 above

(b) Inner and outer rings of roller bearings covered by items (a) and (b) of Sl. No. 5 above

(c) Others

The rate of duty applicable to the bearings of which they are parts.

-do-

150% ad valorem".

Serial No. 5 therein referred to relates to "roller bearings of all types".

3. The goods, according to the appellants, were correctly classifiable under Sl. No. 6(a) above, whereas the respondents wanted the benefit of classification under Sl. No. 6(c).

4. The respondents filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The goods were allowed to be cleared by the High Court on the basis of a provisional assessment extendi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top