SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1354

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, FAIZAN UDDIN
Kashmiri Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Faizan Uddin, J.-The four appellants, namely, Kashmiri Lal, Ravinder Kumar,

Manimohan Rai and Mool Chand were changed and tried alongwith the co-accused Chander Prakash for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 452 read with Section 149 IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, in Sessions Case No. 30 of 1978 (Trial No. 8 of 1978), who by his judgment dated 11th May, 1978 acquitted the co-accused Chander Prakash, but convicted and sentenced the four appellants herein as under:

 

Name of the accused Section (a) Sentence

Kashmiri Lal 326/34 IPC R.I. for 5 years and a fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months.

323 IPC R.I. for three months.

452 IPC R.I. for two years.

All the sentences to run concurrently.

Ravinder Kumar 326/34 IPC R.I. for three years and a fine of Rs. 200, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for two months.

452 IPC R.I. for two years.

Both the sentences to run concurrently.

Manm





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top