SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1101

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Jit Singh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted. We have heard the counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana made on March 9, 1994 in R.S.A. No. 114/93. The respondent, a work charged employee, had gone on leave from April 10, 1986. His service was terminated due to his overstay without due sanction of leave. A letter dated September 3,1986 was communicated to him wherein it was stated that 10 days time from August 25, 1986 was given to him to report for duty failing which his services "may be considered to have been terminated from the date of his absence and he may be informed accordingly through a registered letter". In furtherance thereof, the letter of termination was addressed to the respondent. He filed the suit questioning the said letter.

3. Two contentions have been raised by the respondent, viz., that he was a civil servant and that he was entitled to an enquiry before termination of his service and since it was not done, the order was invalid. He also stated that he had gone on leave with permission of the authorities and that, therefore it cannot be said that he absented without authority of absence. We find that both the cont





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top