SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1381

N.P.SINGH, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Hindustan Steelworks Construction LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Labour – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Spe-cial leave granted.

2. The appellant, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., is a Government company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the work of construction of various types in India and abroad. At all times material to this appeal, the appellant had undertaken to carry out civil engineering work for the 5th respondent, Vishakhapatnam Steel Plant under various contracts. The appellant had registered itself as an employer under Section 7 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

3. Respondent No. 4 M/s. Investigation and Security Services India Pvt. Ltd., is a Private Limited Company which carries on the business of providing security services through contract labour for various companies and individuals. It maintains officers and workmen to render, inter alia, security services to various establishments and individuals. Respondent No. 4 at all material times, possessed a licence as a contractor under Section 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, read with Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971.

4. On or about 11th December,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top