SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1384

1996(7) Supreme 148
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy & Faizan Uddin, JJ.
K. Padmaraju @ Padmanabha Raju & Ors. -Appellants
versus
The Senior Regional Manager, F.C.I., Hyderabad & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 767-69 of 1993
Decided on 3-9-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : P.A. Choudhary, Sr. Advocate, A.D.N. Rao and A. Subba Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Y. Prabhakara Rao, Advocate.

IMPORTANT POINT
Sale deed involving 5 cents of land cannot be relied upon for determining compensation for large extent of land of 33 acres acquired under Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Sections 4 and 23-Determination of compensation-Post-notification sales could not be relied upon as comparable ones-Sale deed in respect of land measuring 5 cents could not be relied upon in determining compensation for large extent of land of 33 acres 84 cents acquired-Lands were agricultural fertile capable of double crops-Prudent seller would sell at rate not less than Rs. 50,000 per acre-Claimants also held entitled to statutory solatium, interest and additional benefits. (Paras 3 to 5)

ORDER

We have heard the learned counsel on both sides.

2. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the "Act") was published on March 5, 1983 acquiring 33 acres 84 cents of land in Village Srungavruksham in Bhimavaram Taluk, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh for construction of FCI godowns. The Land Acquisition Officer in his award made under Section 11 on March 30, 1984 determined compensation at the rate of Rs. 32,500/- per acre for wet land and @ Rs. 32,000/- per acre for dry land. On reference, the Subordinate Judge, Bhimavaram enhanced the compensation to Rs. 90,000/- per acre by his award and decree made under Section 26 on December, 27, 1988. On appeal, the Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court by order dated October 25, 1991 in A.S. Nos. 1392, 1393 and 1394/89 set aside the award of the reference Court and confirmed that of the Land Acquisition Officer. Thus, these appeals by special leave.

3. Though the claimants have relied upon voluminous sale transactions running into as many as 20 sale transactions, Ex. A-1 to A-20 all, except Ex. A-4, are post-notification sales. So they cannot be relied upon as comparable ones. The only relevant document in this case is the sale deed, Ex. A-4 dated June 17, 1982 in respect of land admeasuring 5 cents sold for a sum of Rs. 7500/-. The reference Court dealing with all the sale transactions granted compensation @ Rs. 90,000/- per acre. When a large extent of land of 33 acres 84 cents is acquired for the purpose of constructing godowns, no willing prudent purchaser would offer to purchase the land at the rate of Rs. 90,000 per acre based on mere a sale deed Ex. A-4 involving 5 cents of land. The reference Court, therefore, was obviously in gross error in relying upon that document apart from other documents, in determining the compensation.

4. The question then is: what would be the reasonable compensation which the lands were capable to fetch as on the date of the notification ? It is an indisputable fact that all these lands are agricultural fertile lands situated in West Godavari District and no prudent vendor would sell even at the depressed price for not less than Rs. 50,000/- per acre. It is brought out to our notice from the evidence that railway track pass near the acquired land and there is an easy access to railway station; near the land acquired is also situated a cinema hall; there are built up areas apart from mango growth around the acquired land. Under these circumstances, the lands are capable of double crops; being wet land they cannot be sold at a lesser price. Normally, a prudent seller would sell and the prudent purchaser would purchase at the rate of not less than Rs. 50,000/- per acre. Considered from this perspective and going by the above price, we hold that the market value of the acquired lands would be Rs. 50,000/- per acre. The claimants are entitled to the statutory solatium and interest granted by the reference Court. As regards the value of the trees, the award of the reference Court has not been interfered with by the High Court.

5. The appeal is accordingly allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court stand set aside and the award of the reference Court stands modified. The claimants are entitled to the compensation at the rate of Rs. 50,000/- per acre with solatium at 30% on the enhanced compensation, interest at 9% from the date of the taking possession for one year and 15% on enhanced compensation thereafter till date of deposit in Court. The claimants are entitled to 12% per annum of additional amount from the date of the notification till date of the award under Section 11.

The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.

Appeals allowed accordingly.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top