SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1401

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Beke – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. Though the respondent has been served, no one appeared for him. We requested Shri E.M.S. Anam, learned counsel, to assist the Court as amicus curiae. We deeply appreciate the valuable assistance rendered by him in this case. The facts which are fairly not in dispute are as under:

3. This appeal by special leave petition arises from the judgment and order of the High Court of Kerala made on November 16, 1993 in SA No. 86 of 1988 and the order made on 12.1.1994 in RP No. 251 of 1993 in SA No. 86/88. The admitted facts are that the appellant, as an owner of certain properties, had executed a registered document in which he had mentioned that one acre 65 cents of land together with buildings and trees standing on Survey No. 612/A situated in Manjalamkunnel Myloor Kara Varappetty Pakuthy was given to the father of the appellant for enjoyment during life of the usufruct derived from them. After his demise, the properties would be used for the purpose of Muslim Jamat Mosque. During the life time of the father, by another deed dated November 30, 1980, the above provision was cancelled. We are not concerned with other directions contained in the document.

4. The primary





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top