SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1564

1996(7) Supreme 377
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P. Jeevan Reddy and K.S.
Paripoornan, JJ.
R. Lakshmi -Appellant
versus
K. Saraswathi Ammal -Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 12664-65 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 3096-97 of 1989)
Decided on 27-9-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Ms. Bina Gupta, Ms. T. Sudha and Ramesh Singh, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Wife is competent to maintain application for setting aside ex-parte decree of divorce obtained by her husband but who died after obtaining the decree.

Headnote:Hindu Marriage Act, 1955-Section 13-Ex-parte decree of divorce obtained by husband-Husband died-Wife on coming to know of ex-parte decree, applied for setting aside the decree-Wife is competent to maintain the application.

       Held: We are of the opinion that the wife should be and is competent to maintain the application under Order IX Rule 13. Even though the husband is dead, yet the decree obtained by him is effective in law and determines the status of the appellant. If the appellant says that it is an ex-parte decree and ought to be set aside, her application has to be heard on merits. The decree of divorce determines her status as a wife apart from determining her rights in the properties of her deceased husband. This gives her sufficient locus stand; and right to contest the divorce proceedings even after the death of her husband. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Though the respondent is served, no one appears for the respondent.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is the wife, against whom her husband had obtained an ex-parte decree of divorce. After obtaining the decree, the husband died. The wife on coming to know of the ex-parte decree, applied for setting aside the decree of divorce under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Trial Court dismissed the said application observing since the divorce is a personal remedy, it cannot be pursued after the death of the husband. On appeal, the Trial Court s view was reversed. But the Appellate Court s view has in turn been reversed by the High Court.

3. We are of the opinion that the wife should be and is competent to maintain the application under Order IX Rule 13. Even though the husband is dead, yet the decree obtained by him is effective in law and determines the status of the appellant. If the appellant says that it is an ex-parte decree and ought to be set aside, her application has to be heard on merits. The decree of divorce determines her status as a wife apart from determining her rights in the properties of her decreased husband. This gives her sufficient locus standi and right to contest the divorce proceedings even after the death of her husband.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted to the Trial Court to dispose of the application filed by the appellant under Order IX Rule 13 on merits in accordance with law. No costs.

5. Ms. Bina Gupta says that the appellant has been provided a job in the Electricity Board on compassionate grounds on the basis that she is the wife of the deceased employee. Pending disposal of the divorce proceedings finally, it is directed that she will not be disturbed from the said post.

Appeal allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top