SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1443

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK, FAIZAN UDDIN
Pramod Lahudas Meshram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER

Delay condoned.

2. The petitioner complains that he being a qualified candidate with Diploma in Engineering and Secondary Education had applied for the post of Oversear/Junior Engineer (Civil Engineering) as per the advertisement dated April 30,1991 published in daily Tarun Bharat on May 2, 1991. The advertisement indicated that of the 3 posts, two were reserved for backward classes and one was for general candidates. Petitioner being a reserved class, hailing from the Scheduled Caste, received letter of appointments from the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli, in letter No. PWB/EsttI/1108/1/93 dated March 31, 1993 it was stated that a recommendation had been made by Member Secretary, Regional Subordinate Service Selection Board, Nagpur in their letter No.RSB/Nag/1210/M-792/PS-l/92 dated June 15, 1992 that 3 candidates were selected. The names had been repeated and as regards the petitioner, his recommendation letter No. RSB/Nag/1160/M-792/ 1992/PS-I dated July 31, 1992/7.8.92 was said to be issued, by the Member Secretary selecting the petitioner as Junior Engineer (Civil). Pursuant thereto, he came to be appointed as a Junior Engineer with probati





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top