SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1729

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.P.KURDUKAR
Parveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.P. Kurdukar, J.-Two separate trials resulting into convictions of the appellant arising out of an incident dated August 3, 1989 have given rise to these two appeals. Criminal Appeal No. 735 of 1991 arose out of T & (P) S Case No. 31 of 1990 wherein the appellant was tried and convicted for an offence punishable under Section 25 of the Indian Arms Act but acquitted of an offence under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short TADA ).

Transferred Case (Crl.) No. 1 of 1995 arose out of Sessions Case No. 15 of 1990 wherein the appellant and Parkash were tried for an offence punishable under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Both these cases were tried by the same Additional Sessions Judge, but in two different capacities, one as an Addl. Judge, Designated Court, Faridabad at Narnaul and another as an Addl. Sessions Judge, Narnual. To be more precise, T & (P) S Case No. 31 of 1990 was tried before the Designated Court whereas Sessions Case No. 15 of 1990 was tried before the Addl. Sessions Judge, Narnaul. It may also be stated that preceding this appeal, the investigation was common and some of the material witnesses were















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top