1996(8) Supreme 432
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Bansilal Farms etc. -Appellant
versus
Umarani Bose & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 14754 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13314/1992)
with
Civil Appeal Nos. 14756 & 14757/96
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 13516/92 and 401/93)
Decided on 22-11-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : S.S. Ray, Harish Salve and G. Ramaswamy, Sr. Advocates, Ms. Sarla Chandra, Ms. Aruna Banerjee, G.S. Chatterjee, Samar Dutta, Jaideep Gupta, Praveen Kumar, Advocates.
Held that Nalban Fishery had been requisitioned much prior to the aforesaid decree of this Court dated 18.4.1979 and, therefore, the rights of the State to the fishery either by virtue of the requisition order or by virtue of any provision of any other statute remained protected and as such said State of West Bengal can t be bound down by the so-called allotment of fisheries in favour of some members of the Sarkar family under the compromise decree in question. The Nalban Fishery had been requisitioned by the State of West Bengal in exercise of power under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land Requisition and Acquisition Act is not disputed and cannot be disputed since the validity of the said order of requisition had been challenged by the Sarkar family in the Calcutta High Court and being unsuccessful there, they had also filed special leave petition in this Court in SLP (C) No. 1452/72 which was ultimately dismissed by this Court on 17.11.1972. The dismissal of the special leave petition as aforesaid affirmed that the Nalban Fishery had been legally requisitioned by the State of West Bengal and the State was in possession of the same since 8.11.1969. (Para 8)
Further held; the possession which was taken by the earlier Receiver was a symbolical one and factually the State had not been divested of its possession which it took on 8.11.1969. In our considered opinion the succeeding Receiver rightly took into account the directions of this Court passed on 18.4.1979 and 24.4.1979 and rightly took the view that the rights and interest of the State in relation to Nalban Fishery is not affected in any manner by the so-called allotment of the fishery in the partition decree amongst the members of the Sarkar family. (Para 9)
Consequently held that the rights and interest of the State of West Bengal was not in any way be affected by the so-called partition and allotment of the Nalban Fishery inter se amongst the members of the Sarkar family, the said order dated 6.10.1980 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court will not stand on the way of the State in claiming and putting forth its interest and right over the Nalban Fishery. (Para 10)
JUDGEMENT
Pattanaik, J.-Leave granted.
2. These three appeals by special leave are directed against one and the same judgment dated 25.09.1992 of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court. The three appellants are the State of West Bengal in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 401 of 1993, the State Fishery Development Corporation Ltd. in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 13516 of 1992 and Bansilal Farms in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 13314 of 1992. The respondents are the members of one Sarkar family in the city of Calcutta. The dispute centres around a fishery called Nalban Fishery.
3. A suit for partition was filed by one of the Co-sharers of said Sarkar family in the High Court of Calcutta on 3.9.1995, which was registered as Suit No. 2539 of 1955. He schedule of properties included the disputed Nalban Fishery. A learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court passed a preliminary decree in the said suit on 11.8.1960. One of the Co-sharers of the Sarkar family preferred an appeal against the preliminary decree before the Division Bench which was registered as Appeal No. 200 of 1960. During the pendency of the aforesaid appeal the State of West Bengal requisitioned large extent of fisheries including the disputed Nalban Fishery on 5.11.1969 in exercise of power under Section 3(1) of the West Bengal Land Requisition and Acquisition Act of 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Requisition Act ). Pursuant to the aforesaid requisition order the State of West Bengal took possession of the Nalban Fishery on 8.11.1969. Members of the Sarkar family challenged the order of requisition by filing a writ petition in Calcutta High Court in November, 1969 which was registered as Civil Rule No. 7317 (W) of 1969. The aforesaid writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. The appeal to the Division Bench was preferred against the aforesaid order of dismissal which was registered as F.M.A. No. 126 of 1970. The Division Bench dismissed the appeal by its order dated 5.7.1971. Sarkar family moved this Court in SLP (C) No. 1452 of 1972. By order dated 17.11.1972 this Court dismissed the special leave petition. The appeal arising out of the partition suit bearing Suit No. 2539 of 1955 which had been registered as Appeal No. 200 of 1960 was finally disposed of by the Division Bench and the said order was assailed in this Court in SLP (C) Nos. 5370 & 5371 of 1978. The said two appeals arising out of the said two special leave petitions were disposed of by order dated 18.4.1979 on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties on intervention of Shri Ashok Sen who was appearing for one of the parties but it was indicated in the order that the State s right in relation to the fisheries will not be affected by the decree in question. This Court further ordered:
"we again wish to re-emphasize that the terms of the decree shall not effect the rights of the State of West Bengal, in any manner whatsoever to the fisheries in question, if they have vested in State under the provisions of the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act of 1953 (Act X of 1954)".
4. Prior to the passing of the aforesaid order on April 18, 1979 while granting special leave petition on 10.11.1978 this Court had directed that the State of West Bengal will be made a party to the proceeding and further the Collector 24 Parganas was appointed as Receiver in respect of the fisheries owned by the Sarkar family. The Court had also further directed that the Collector will be the Receiver in respect of the fisheries which has not already been vested in the State and whose possession has not already been taken over by the State. Pursuant to the aforesaid order appointing Collector 24 Parganas as Receiver, the Collector 24 Parganas took possession of the fisheries including Nalban Fishery as Receiver and submitted a compliance report dated 22.11.1978 to the Registrar of this Court. It may be noted that Nalban Fishery had been requisitioned by the State of West Bengal unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.