SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1738

B.L.HANSARIA, G.N.RAY
Anthony C. Leo – Appellant
Versus
Nandlal Bal Krishnan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.-Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The order dated February 23, 1996 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Appeal (Lodged) No. 3 of 1996 in Suit No. 1010 of 1973 in the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction arising out of the Order dated December 6, 1995 passed by the learned Single Judge on the reports of the receiver appointed by the Court in the said Suit No. 1010 of 1973 in so far as the same affects the appellant, Mr. Anthony C. Leo. is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.

3. Nandlal Balkrishnan Khanna and other partners of Khanna Construction House obtained a lease of Plot No. 44 of Scheme No. 58, Worli Estate, Bombay from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The said partners constructed a building on the said plot known as Khanna Construction House. The appellant claims tenancy in respect of a room in the said premises under the said partners where he is running a business named and styled as Flore Chinese Restaurant. In view of disputes arising between the partners of M/s Khanna Construction House, one of the partners filed a suit in the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the Bombay High Cou




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top