K.VENKATASWAMI, S.P.BHARUCHA
Metagraphs Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Venkataswami, J.-The only question that arises for our consideration in all these Appeals is whether Printed Aluminium Labels (hereinafter referred to as "labels") manufactured by the appellant are products of the printing industry within the meaning of Notification 55/75-CE dated 1.3.1975 (hereinafter called "the Notification") issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
2. It is not in dispute that but for the exemption under the Notification, the labels in question , would fall under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called the "Act"). The relevant portion of the said Notification is extracted below:-
"In exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts goods of the description specified in the Schedule annexed hereto, and falling under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, (I of 1944) from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon.
* * * *
13. All products of the printing industry including newspapers and printed periodicals."
3. It appears that the a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.