SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2100

SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA
Fag Precision Bearings – Appellant
Versus
Sales Tax Officer (1 – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bharucha, J.-The respondents have been served but have not appeared.

2. The judgment and order under appeal was passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat. It dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellant.

3. The appellant carries on the business of manufacture and sale of ball and roller bearings at Vadodara in Gujarat. It is registered as a dealer under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969. The writ petition was filed to quash the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax dated 31st August, 1987, passed under Section 42(1) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act and Rule 37-A of the rules thereunder staying until 31st August, 1988, the appellant s assessment for the period at September, 1976, to 31st August, 1984, and to restrain the Sales Tax Officer from making any assessment and penalty orders for the said period and for consequential reliefs.

4. The order of the Deputy Commissioner dated 31st August, 1987, so far as is relevant stated :

"Since some more time will be taken and the assessment proceedings are not likely to be completed within the prescribed time, and the assessment for the period 1.9.1976 to 31.3.1984 for the paid ass




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top