SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1824

M.M.PUNCHHI, K.T.THOMAS
Anokhe Lal – Appellant
Versus
Radhamohanbansal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Thomas, J.-Leave granted.

2. A landlord has come up in challenge of an order passed by a Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur, by which the application of first respondent to get himself impleaded as a party in a suit has been granted.

3. Facts are these :

Appellant - landlord filed the suit for eviction of his tenant (M/s. Hanuman Prasad Shriram - a partnership firm) from a building leased out to the firm on the two grounds envisaged in Section 12(1)(a) & (f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The suit was contested by the firm and written statement for the firm was signed by one of its partners (Motiram). During the pendency of the suit, first respondent in this appeal (who is the son of Hanuman Prasad - another partner of the firm who died) filed an application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code ) to get himself impleaded as an additional defendant in the suit. The application was dismissed by the trial court against which first respondent filed a revision before the District Court, but the revision was dismissed on 15.3.1994. First respondent filed a second application stating it to be under












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top