SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2004

1996(8) Supreme 753
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.T. Nanavati, JJ.
Adavala Sathaiah & Ors. -Appellants
versus
The Special Dy. Collector, Land Acquisition Unit I & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 15487 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 16683 of 1993)
Decided on 26-11-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : A. Subba Rao, Annam D.N. Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondents : K.C. Dua and G. Prabhakar, Advocates.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 23-Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.4000/- and Rs.4,500/- per acre for Group I & Group II of lands-Reference Court enhanced compensation to Rs.10,000/- and Rs.11,500/- per acre-High Court remanded the matter for reconsideration-Appeal-Lands were agricultural and their prevailing market value varied between Rs.6000 to Rs. 6,500 per acre-It would be just and proper to fix compensation of Rs. 6000/- per acre uniformly. (Paras 2 & 3)

       

ORDER

Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 11 to 14 and 18 have left their respective places without any instructions as per endorsement made by the Postal authorities. Under these circumstances, notice on them is not necessary. Regarding respondent Nos. 4, 7 to 10, 15 to 17 and 19 to 20, it is stated that neither unserved envelops nor A.D. Cards have been received back by the Registry. Under these circumstances, they must be deemed to have been served. Even though the petitioners succeed, these respondents cannot get the same benefit because they did not challenge the award. They being pro forma respondents, notice on them is not necessary.

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and decree of the A.P. High Court, made on March 3, 1992 in the Appeal No. 2660/85. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published on December 8, 1979, acquiring 71 acres 12 cents of land for the public purpose, namely, erection of National Thermal Power Corporation. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs.4,000/- and Rs.4,500/- per acre for Group I and Group II of the lands. On reference, the Subordinate Judge enhanced the compensation to Rs.10,000/- and Rs.11,500/- per acre for Group I and Group II respectively. On appeal, the High Court set aside the judgment and remanded the matter to the trial Court for reconsideration. Thus this appeal by special leave.

3. It is seen that all the lands were agricultural lands at the time of acquisition and their prevailing market value varies between Rs.6,000/- to Rs.6,500/- per acre. Under these circumstances, it would be just and proper if the compensation is fixed at Rs.6,000/- per acre uniformly to all the lands. It is ordered accordingly.

4. The appeal is allowed. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top