SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2063

1997(1) Supreme 111
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S Anand and K.T. Thomas, JJ.
Mohmedrafiz Husenmiya Thakor & Ors. -Appellants
versus
State of Gujarat -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1992
Decided on 3-12-1996

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302/149-Deceased along with PW 5 and PW6 were surrounded by a large number of people-They belonged to two communities who were on warpath-On call of appellant accused A49 to kill deceased, accused armed with spear, razor and lathis attacked deceased-PW5 and PW6 too sustained some injuries-Trial Court rightly placed reliance on testimony of two witnesses-Evidence proved that assailants formed unlawful assembly whose common object was to finish off deceased-Deceased was mangled brutally and fatally-Trial Court convicted nine accused appellants out of 63 accused charge-sheeted-Identity of four appellants found doubtful-Two accused named by witnesses could not be fixed up with crime as among the 63 accused there were two other persons bearing same name-Trial Courts directed to indicate the rank of accused besides using the name while recording evidence involving multiplicity of accused. (Paras 5 to 12)

       

JUDGMENT

Thomas, J.-Girishbhai was a Secretary of the local unit (Bhalej) of Vishwa Hindu Parishad and he was murdered by a group of people by attacking him with lethal weapons on the night of 27.3.1990. Police charge-sheeted 63 persons for the said murder and also for certain other allied offences before a designated Court at Kheda district (Gujarat State) set up under the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short the TADA Act ). Learned Judge has convicted nine of them of the charge of murder with the aid of Section 149 IPC and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life. They are the appellants in this appeal which has been filed under Section 19 of the TADA Act. (We may mention here itself that two other accused-Jusabmiya Rahimmiya (A51) and Mohsinmiya Resulmiya (A62) - were convicted under Section 323 IPC and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for two months and they too have joined as appellants in this appeal. But in view of the relatively minor offence found against them learned counsel for the appellants did not press the appeal as for those two persons, more so because both of them had already undergone the sentence). Appeal on their behalf would, therefore, stand dismissed. As the accused are so many in number and as the names of many of them have close resemblance with the names of some other accused, we propose, for convenience, to refer to them in this judgment by the rank given to each of them in the trial Court.

2. Facts of the prosecution case are surmarised like this : There was communal unrest in the village Bhalej for sometime. People belonging to two communities were on warpath against each other and criminal cases were registered by the police against some persons belonging to both communities. Girishbhai, being the Secretary of Bhalej Unit of Vishwa Hindu Parishad became a focus for those who were opposed to the movement. On the day of occurrence, Girishbhai along with Jitubhai (PW5) and Nathubhai (PW6) alighted from a bus at Bhalej old Bus stop around 9.00 P.M. As they proceeded and reached near Rafiq Pan Centre, they were surrounded by a large number of people who were variously armed with spear, razor and lathis etc. One of them (Mahemudmiya Isamiya - A49) gave a clarion call to kill the deceased and so saying he aimed a blow at the deceased with a dharia. The blow was warded off by the deceased with his hands. Then a feeble attempt was made by Jitubhai (PW5) and Nathubhai (PW6) to save their comrade, but they were driven away by the assailants during the course of which they too were beaten with lathis. Thereafter, the assailants showered Girishbhai with blows using weapons in their hands. One Anil Kumar (PW4) who happened to see the beginning part of the encounter rushed to house of the village Sarpanch (PW3) and informed him of the incident. PW3 then set out in search of the deceased but could not locate him even at the place of incident. He later came to know that Girishbhai was taken in a car to the hospital in a badly injured condition. Later, Girishbhai succumbed to his injuries.

3. First Information Report was registered on the strength a complaint lodged by PW3. The Investigating Officer arrested the accused and recovered some weapons. On completion of investigation final report was laid against 63 persons for offences ranging from Section 302 IPC to Section 3 and 4(4) of the TADA Act. However, learned judge of the designated court found that prosecution succeeded in proving that the nine appellants have committed the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149, IPC, but could not prove any other offence. Accordingly, the nine appellants were convicted and sentenced as aforesaid.

4. Girishbhai sustained a large number of injuries from the pate of his head upto the tibial mallasous of his legs. Such injuries included lacerated wounds involving his skull and brain and incised wounds involving other vital organs. Details of the wounds have been described by











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top