SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1716

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Seema Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have learned counsel on both sides.

2. These appeals by special leave arise from the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Shimla Bench made in O.A. No.619/95 and the review order. The admitted position is that the Director of Education issued a notice for Junior Basic Teachers Training. The criteria for selection was 100 marks based on the percentage of marks obtained in matric or equivalent examinations. 20 marks for candidates belonging rural areas and 10 marks for candidates belonging to backward panchayat were allotted. Similarly, 10 marks were allotted for candidates belonging to IRDP families. Though the appellant claimed to belong to IRDP family, the authorities have not considered her claim and consequently did not award 10 marks as required under the criteria. When the appellant filed the writ petition, the High Court dismissed the same holding that the appellant had not produced the certificate along with the application and, therefore, she is not entitled to the above status. When we directed the appellant to produce the record, she made the certificate a part of the record. Unfortunately, it does not bear the date of issue; but we find th




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top