SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 28

B.N.KIRPAL, J.S.VERMA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Col. P. S. Bhargava – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kirpal, J.-In this appeal, from the judgment of the Guwahati High Court, the question of law requiring consideration is whether an army officer, who has earned persionary and other retirement benefits, must forfeit the same on his resigning the job from the Army.

2. The respondent joined the Army Dental Corps sometimes in the year 1960. He was given grading in Army in 1962. Thereafter he served in different capacities and was classified as a specialist and had been promoted to the rank of Lt. Colonel. On 2.1.1984 the respondent wrote a letter requesting for permission to resign from the service w.e.f. 30.4.1984 or from an early date. The said letter contained the reasons why he wanted to resign. The said resignation was accepted by communication dated 24.7.1984 in which it was stated that the respondent shall stand relieved of all army duties as early as possible, but not later than 24.8.1984. In this letter, it was also mentioned that consequent upon his resignation the respondent shall not be entitled to gratuity, pension, leave pending resignation and travel concession.

3. On the receipt of the aforesaid letter, the respondent wrote a letter dated 18.8.1984 stating that he



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top