SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2112

G.T.NANAVATI, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Hotel Ratrani Through Its Proprietor Kanji Vishwram Patel, Bhuj (Kutch) – Respondent


Order

The main appeal by special leave arises from the judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat, made on March 1/4, 1985 in Special Civil Application No. 4459/84 and batch. The other appeals relate to the decision of the Bombay High Court in Ramesh Waman Roke & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra1. The Gujarat High Court has followed the decision of the Bombay High Court. In all the cases, the facts are not in dispute.

2. The respective Legislatures brought Section 6-A in Bombay and the Gujarat Entertainment Tax Act, 1977 providing for levy and collection of tax on entertainment by Video Cassette Recorder or Player on Television or Videoscope in any place of entertainment or omnibus etc. at the rates specified therein. The latter Act came into force w.e.f. June 14, 1984. The Government made Rules by name, Gujarat Cinema (Regulation & Exhibition by Video) Rules, 1984 (for short, the "Rules"). The Rules have come into force on the same date. The respondents filed the writ petitions challenging the constitutionality of Section 6-A, Rules 13(1) and 19(ii) of the Rules. The High Court while upholding the constitutionality of the Act and the Rules held that the gross collection of the ente












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top