SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1819

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Cheema Engineering Services – Appellant
Versus
Rajan Singh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. The only question for consideration is: whether the respondent has been using the machine "Brickman" for clay preparation, brick moulding, brick drying and brick burning, after purchasing the same from the appellant for earning his livelihood within the meaning of Explanation to Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986? Section 2(1)(d) reads as under :

" Consumer means any person who:-

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

(ii) hires any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person wh







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top