How to determine if a review petition can be filed after the dismissal of an appeal or special leave petition? What is the legal consequence of filing a review petition by a new advocate without the consent of the original advocate on record? What are the procedural requirements for filing an application for clarification after a review petition has been dismissed?

Key Points: - A review petition cannot be filed after the dismissal of an appeal or special leave petition unless a rare case of apparent error of law or fact on the record exists (!) (!) . - Filing a review petition by an advocate who was neither the counsel nor present during the main hearing is not in the interest of the profession and is not permitted (!) (!) . - An advocate filing a review petition must obtain a "No Objection Certificate" from the original Advocate-on-Record to come on record (!) . - Once a review petition is dismissed, no application for clarification should be filed, especially if it involves changing the advocate-on-record (!) (!) . - The practice of changing advocates to file repeated petitions is deemed an abuse of the court's process and should be deprecated (!) (!) . - Applications filed as abuse of process, such as the one for clarification in this case, are liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs (!) (!) . - In this specific instance, the application was dismissed with exemplary costs of Rs. 20,000/- payable to the Supreme Court Legal Aid Services Committee (!) . - The Registry is directed to communicate the order regarding costs to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee for recovery if not paid (!) .

How to determine if a review petition can be filed after the dismissal of an appeal or special leave petition?

What is the legal consequence of filing a review petition by a new advocate without the consent of the original advocate on record?

What are the procedural requirements for filing an application for clarification after a review petition has been dismissed?