SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 2054

1997(1) Supreme 533
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy and G.T. Nanavati, JJ.
State of Orissa & Ors. -Appellants
versus
Sukanti Debi -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 15712 of 1996
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13435 of 1996)
Decided on 2-12-1996
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants : Ms. Kirti Mishra, Advocate.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Respondent came to be appointed as Hindi Teacher which was not sanctioned post-Tribunal was not right in issuing direction to appoint him in future vacancy. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack, made on March 2, 1995 in OA.No. 1499/93. Though the respondent was served on September 30, 1996, he did not appear. Therefore, we adjourned the matter by proceedings dated October 28, 1996 to see whether he appears or is represented through counsel. Even today, he has not appeared.

3. The only question is: whether the direction issued by the Tribunal to appoint him in future vacancy is valid in law? It is seen that the third respondent came to be appointed in a third post as Hindi Teacher which was not sanctioned post; nor was the need for such an appointment recognised by the management. It is also stated that he was not qualified for the post. We need not go into the question of his qualification. Suffice it would be to state that the Government in their letter dated May 1, 1992 have stated as under :

"I am directed to invite a reference to Govt. In Education Department Letter No. 13409, dated 17.3.1992 and to inform you that Hindi being a non-Examinable subject in M.E. Schools, There is no neek to allow the existing Hindi teachers in M.E. Schools to continue further. Therefore, It was decided that the Hindi teachers who are... in M.E. Schools will be adjusted against the third post of teachers in M.E. Schools provided they possessed Matric C.T. Qualification. In case any of them not...C.T. Qualification he should be given chance to acquire C.T. Qualification as in service candidate by summer vacation....... He will be allowed untrained scale of pay till then. In case any one is non-Matric he should be given the chance to acquire an equal C.T. Qualification. In case of former, the qualification would be acquired within three years for issue of order and in case the non-Matriculation qualification should be acquired within period of Five Years.

In view of the above, the Tribunal was not right in giving the direction.

4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top