SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1689

K.RAMASWAMY, G.B.PATTANAIK
Nalini Navin Bhagwati – Appellant
Versus
Chandravadan M. Mehta – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dated August 14, 1995 made in Civil Revision Application Nos. 1142 and 1148 of 1995 and the order dated July 18, 1995 made in Civil Application Nos. 2825 & 2829 of 1995 in CRA Nos. 1142 & 1148 of 1995.

3. The admitted facts are that one Manvantrai Mehta owned Plot No. 13 in Krishna Cooperative Housing Society at Ahmedabad and also an open plot No. 14 in the said society. He died on 16.1.1995 leaving behind his widow Kamlaben and five children, namely, Narendra, Chandravadan (Respondents herein) and Nalini, Chandrakalaben and Vasantben (petitioners herein). In other words, he left behind him three daughters and two sons. Plot No. 13 was in the name of Narendera Mehta who died on August 8, 1971. But his wife was not known. Kamlaben also died on September 16, 1984. The respondents filed C.M. Application No. 123 of 1985 in the Civil Court at Ahmedabad and obtained probate to the will left by Kamlaben, their mother. The probate was granted on January 16, 1987. The appellants on coming to know of the said probate filed an application to revoke the probate. The Civil Judge, City Civil Co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top