SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1666

K.T.THOMAS, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Mahendra Singh Chotelal Bhargad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.K. Mukherjee, J.-For obtaining an illegal gratification of Rs. 3,000/- from Rajkumar Mohanram Sawani, (P.W.1) through Mahendra Singh, the appellant before us, Uttamrao Baburao Raut, Inspector and Abdul Kadar, Sub Inspector (hereinafter referred to as A1 and A2 respectively), of Ramdaspeth Police Station, Akola were convicted under Section 161 I.P.C. and 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, while the appellant was convicted under Section 163 I.P.C. Aggrieved thereby they preferred separate appeals before the Bombay High Court which were disposed of with an order of affirmation of the conviction of the appellant and acquittal of the two Police Officers. Hence this appeal.

2. According to the prosecution case, in the night intervening April 12 and 13, 1984, A1 and A2 carried a raid at Seema Guest House of Akola and found Madhukar @ Shaligram Raut (P.W.10) and one Ashok Thakur indulging in immoral sexual activities with two girls. They were arrested and brought to the Police Station by A1 and A2. Rajkumar (P.W.1), the Manager of the Guest House, and Pramod Gangaramji Bhirad (P.W.5), a friend of the persons arrested, went to the Police Station and s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top