SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1634

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Constitution Of India – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Works Department, Government Of Orissa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Leave granted in S.L.P. (C) No. 9060 of 1991.

2. The appellant in these three appeals had entered into three separate agreements with the respondents relating to a works contract. The arbitration clauses under these three contracts were similar and required a reference being made to the Superintending Engineer of the respondents unconnected with the work. However, as the respondents did not refer the disputes to arbitration, an application was made by the appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act of 1940. The Court passed the following order dated 15.9.1981 on the application by consent of parties from the panel of names given by both parties. Both the panels contained the name of Shri G.S. Patnaik. The order was as follows :

"Both the parties have filed panel of names for appointment of Arbitrator. Heard. Shri G.S. Patnaik, Chairman, Arbitration Tribunal, Orissa, is appointed as sole Arbitrator, send the reference to him."

3. Accordingly, arbitration proceedings were commenced by the Arbitrator. The appellant filed separate statements of case in each of the three cases. The respondents filed their counter claim and/or replies. The parties wer
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top