SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1486

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Aamenabai Tayebaly – Appellant
Versus
Competent Authority Under Safema – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar, J.-This appeal by special leave seeks to challenge judgment and order rendered by a Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 2841 of 1982 : By the impugned judgment the order of respondent-competent authority forfeiting the property in question under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as SAFEMA ) came to be confirmed.

2. In order to appreciate the grievance of the appellants it is necessary to note a few introductory facts.

Introductory Facts

3. One Talab Haji Hussein Sumbhania was detained Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as COFEPOSA ) by the Government of Gujarat by order dated 02nd April 1976. Before the said order of detention, the  second wife of said Talab Haji Hussein, Tahira Sultana, purchased a flat being Flat No. 25 in Dharam Jyoti Premises Co-operative Housing Society, Bandra Bombay in February 1975 for a consideration of Rs. 88,562/-. On 15th February 1977 the competent authority issued a notice under Section 6(1) of SAFEMA to the said Tahira Sultana calling upon her to show cause why the said flat purch



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top