SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 223

1997(2) supreme 576
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy & S. Saghir Ahmad, JJ.
Dr. P.N. Dubey & Ors. -Appellants
versus
State of Madhya Pradesh -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3349 (N) of 1981
Decided on 6-2-1997
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellants : Tirupurari Ray and Vineet Kumar, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Sakesh Kumar and S.K. Agnihotri, Advocates.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Madhya Pradesh Services (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1966-Post of Assistant Director Veterinary Service-Channel of recruitment was by direct recruitment and promotion in proportion of one is to one-Filling up of post by direct recruitment for 50% of vacancies was in accordance with Rules-No illegality warranting interference. (Para 1)

       

ORDER

This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur Bench, made on February 10, 1981 in Miscellaneous Petition No. 812/80. The appellants were working as Veterinary Assistant Surgeons in the Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Services Gazetted. The Madhya Pradesh Veterinary Services is governed by the rules called Madhya Pradesh Services (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1966. The channel of recruitment to the post of Assistant Director Veterinary Service was from two sources, namely, direct recruitment and promotion in the proportion of one is to one. An advertisement came to be made by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission of 28 posts of Assistant Directors. The appellants had challenged the validity of the Notification and selection on the ground that the Government had, by then decided, to provide recruitment to the post of Assistant Directors by promotion with 100% from the feeder cadre, namely, Veterinary Assistant Surgeon. It is found, as a fact, by the High Court that as on the date of the notification, the rules were not amended. Unamended Rules provide that the recruitment was to be made from two sources, namely, direct recruitment and by promotion at a ratio of one is to one. Consequently, the advertisement for recruitment of Assistant Directors by the Public Service Commission and selection and appointment of the candidates were valid in law. The same came to be challenged in this appeal. It is seen that undoubtedly though decision was taken by the Government, the Rules have not been amended. Therefore, the advertisement made for recruitment to fill up the posts of Assistant Directors, by direct recruitment and consequential selection as per the unamended Rules for the 50% of the vacancies earmarked for direct recruitment was in accordance with the aforesaid Rules. As a consequence, the view taken by the High Court is consistent with the Rules. We do not find any illegality warranting interference.

2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.

Appeal dismissed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top