SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 361

K.T.THOMAS, M.M.PUNCHHI
Hajee S. V. M. Mohamed Jamaludeen Brothers And Company – Appellant
Versus
Government Of T. N. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Thomas, J.-Can the government unilaterally rescind a contract if the terms thereof provide ? A Single judge of the Madras High Court has held that any such term in the agreement is null and void being repugnant to the essence of the contract. Upon such a finding learned single judge granted a decree in favour of the appellant for a sum of nearly Rupees Thirty Six lacs with future interest. But a division bench of the same High Court, before which the government appealed, reversed the decree and dismissed the suit of the appellant mainly on the strength of the provisions of the Government Grants Act, 1895 (for short the Grants Act ). Appellant has preferred this appeal after obtaining a certificate from the High Court under Article 134-A of the Constitution of India.

2. Facts, bereft of elaborate details but necessary for this appeal, are the following:

Pursuant to acceptance of the offer made by the appellant, being the highest bid, agreements were executed between Government of Tamil Nadu and the appellant as per which right to collect "chank shells" from four different coastal sites situated in four different districts in Tamil Nadu was granted to the appellant for a perio

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top