SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 477

J.S.VERMA, B.N.KIRPAL
Allahabad Bank – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Kumar Bhola – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Key Points: - The bank had jurisdiction to suspend an employee when charges framed alleging offences involving moral turpitude, based on clause 19.3 of the First Bipartite Settlement, 1966. (!) (!) (!) - Moral turpitude includes offences such as forgery and wrongful withdrawal of money by a bank employee; suspension grounded on pending prosecution is valid if supported by material indicating such conduct. (!) (!) - The High Court erred in quashing the suspension order; the appellate court held that there was application of mind and that nearly 10 years elapsed since charge-sheet does not render suspension invalid. (!) (!)

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


JUDGMENT

Kirpal, J.-This is an appeal from the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and quashed an order of suspension which had been passed pending prosecution launched against him. Briefly stated the facts are that during the year 1984-85, the respondent was working as Clerk-cum-Typist in Allahabad Bank with one of its branch at Lucknow. An investigation was conducted by the Delhi Special Police Establishment and a case was registered on 29.8.1986. The C.B.I./S.P.E., Lucknow, after investigation, submitted a report whereupon the Superintendent of Police wrote a letter dated 18.9.1987 to the appellant bank for according sanction for prosecution of the respondent and one other person namely Ajay Bhatia inter alia for criminal mis-conduct and cheating.

2. On the receipt of the aforesaid letter the appellant took steps to accord sanction to prosecute the respondent. It also decided to take action under clause 19.3 (a) of the First Bipartite Settlement 1966 between the management and the Union and to suspend the respondent. Accordingly, the suspension order dated 23.9.1987 was passed which reads as under :

"Since it is revealed
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top