SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 392

1997(3) Supreme 211
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy & G.T. Nanavati, JJ.
Basudev Pati -Petitioner
versus
State of Orissa & Anr. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 4084 of 1997
Decided on 3-3-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner : Janaranjan Das, K.N. Tripathy, D. Mohanty, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Service as a Lecturer is entirely different from Administrative Service and a person cannot be permitted to have benefit of U.G.C. scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in pay-scale on that basis.

Headnote:SERVICE LAW-Protection of last pay drawn-Petitioner working as a Lecturer was selected to Orissa Administrative Service pay scale of Rs. 525-1150-His pay as Lecturer was fixed at Rs. 780.-Service as a Lecturer was entirely different from service of Orissa Administrative Service-He could not be permitted to have benefit of UGC scale in Administrative Service & fitment in pay-scale on that basis. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

This special leave petition is filed against the order of the Orissa Administrative Tribunal at Cuttack passed on December 6, 1996, in Transfer Application No. 610/87.

2. Admittedly, the petitioner, while working as a Lecturer, had appeared in competitive examination and was selected to the Orissa Administrative Service. As Orissa Administrative Service, Class-II, his scale of pay was Rs. 525-1150/-. Earlier, also when he worked as Lecturer, the scale of pay was Rs. 525-1150/- which was subsequently revised by the University Grants Commission w.e.f. April 1, 1974 to Rs. 700-1600/-. In that pay scale, his pay fixed at Rs. 780. He was paid arrears of salary with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974. After he was selected and appointed to the Orissa Administrative Service, he sought protection of his last drawn pay and his upgraded fitment in the pay scale in the Orissa Administrative Service. The Tribunal has rejected the claim. Thus this special leave petition.

3. Shri Janaranjan Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contends that since the petitioner had been given the pay scale with retrospective effect from 1.1.1974, on his appointment to the Orissa Administrative Service, his last drawn pay need to be protected. As per the instructions of the Accountant General, his pay is entitled to be fixed at Rs. 780/- in the pay scale in the service of Orissa Administrative Service. We find no force in the contention. The service as a Lecturer is entirely different from the service of the Orissa Administrative Service. Merely because he happened to work earlier as a Lecturer and in the same pay scale which was subsequently revised, he cannot be permitted to have the benefit of U.G.C. scale in the Administrative Service and fitment in the pay-scale on that basis. That would create imbalance and gross infraction and distortion and would result in flood of claims of similarly situated persons under Article 39(d) of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, such a course cannot be permitted to be adopted.

4. The special leave petition is dismissed accordingly.

SLP dismissed.

********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top