1997(3) Supreme 404
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K. Ramaswamy & S. Saghir Ahmad, JJ.
Satish Kumar -Appellant
versus
Zarif Ahmed & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 383 of 1984
Decided on 20-2-1997
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Manoj Goel, Advocate for R.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent : Shakil Ahmed Syed, Advocate.
ORDER
This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, made on October 2, 1982 and August 9, 1983 in Civil Revision No. 3613/78.
2. The admitted position is that the appellant-landlord had entered into an agreement of lease with the respondent-tenant on August 30, 1969 for a period of 11 months for rent @ Rs. 220/- per mensem. Notice of demand for arrears and also for termination of tenancy for non-payment was delivered to the respondent on April 8, 1972. Thereafter, the appellant filed suit on the small cause side for ejectment of the respondent. The trial Court decreed the suit on May 19, 1977. The tenants then filed the revision in the High Court. The learned single Judge referred the following two questions for decision by a Divison Bench :
"1. Whether any term of a lease deed required under Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act to be registered, could be pressed into service for a collateral purpose within the meaning of the proviso to Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act ?
2. Whether, in the instant case, the relationship of landlord and tenant, the rate of rent and the period for which the original lease has been granted could be looked into as a collateral purpose under the proviso to Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act?"
3. The Division Bench has answered the reference and held that the lease deed is in, admissible evidence and cannot be looked into and oral evidence in proof of the tenancy is also inadmissible. After the reference was answered, the learned single Judge, following the reference order, allowed the revision and set aside the decree of eviction. Thus, this appeal by special leave.
4. The only question that arises for consideration is : whether the unregistered lease deed is admissible in evidence? Section 17(1)(d) of the Registration Act postulates Thus:
"(1) the following document shall be registered if the property to which it relates is situate in a district in which, and if it may have been executed on or after the date on which, Act No. XVI of 1864, or the Indian Registration Act, 1866, or the Indian Registration Act, 1871 or the Indian Registration Act 1877, or the Indian Registration Act, 1908 came or comes into force, namely-
(d) leases of immovable property from year to year, or for any term exceeding one year, or reserving a yearly rent."
5. "Instrument" has been defined in Section 2(14) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 postulating that "[I]nstrument includes every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended extinguished or record.
6. Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (for short the TP Act ) also defines "instrument" to mean a non-testamentary instrument. Section 107 of the TP Act regulates how lease is to be made. The first part thereof provides that a lease of immovable property from year to year, or for any term exceeding one year, or reserving a yearly rent, can be made only by a registered instrument. The second part thereof gives exception to the first part and provides that all other leases of immovable property may be made either by a registered instrument or by oral agreement accompanied by delivery of possession.
7. The question, therefore, that arises is: whether a lease of immovable property from month to month or for 11 months is a compulsorily registerable document, though it was reduced to writing as an instrument defined under Section 2(14) of the Stamp Act? A conjoint reading of the first part of Section 107 read with Section 17(1)(d) of the Registration Act, as extracted hereinbefore does indicate that a lease of immovable property from year to year, or for any term exceeding one year or reserving a yearly rent should be made only by a registered instrument and all other instruments, though reduced to writing and possession is delivered thereunder, are not compulsorily registerable instruments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.