SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 396

G.T.NANAVATI, K.RAMASWAMY
Prakash Chandra Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Transport Authority – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. This appeal by special leave arises from the order dated August 9, 1996, made by the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court in OJC No. 3073/95.

3. The admitted position is that at one point of time the appellant had a permanent stage carriage permit operating on the inter-State route, viz., Peralakhemundi to Brahampur via Chatrapur and Garabandha. After the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 came into force, the appellant filed an application for renewal of the permit and the dispute arose whether he is entitled to renewal of the permit. Since, admittedly, the permit granted under Act 4 of 1939 expired after the 1988 Act came into force, he was to apply afresh under the 1988 Act. Earlier when he had filed a Writ Petition, OJC No. 3421/93, the High Court had directed reconsideration of the application for renewal and also the application of the contesting respondents, after decision was taken on the application of the petitioner therein. Admittedly, the State Transport Authority had considered their applications and rejected the application for renewal and granted fresh permit to the third respondent. On a clarification sought by the contesting respondent, the High Cou




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top